Mistake by the Lake Sporting Times

for the Cleveland sports fan

Wednesday, December 14, 2005

What's Wrong With the Cavs?

by Corey

You may have noticed that the Cavs followed up their 9-2 start with a 2-7 second act, including, most recently, a loss to the 4-16 Atlanta Hawks. Let the record show that it is not time to panic yet; nonetheless, my eyebrows have been raised.

So what's the problem? I don't think it's the offense in any way, shape or form, as the Cavs are still 2nd in the NBA in offensive efficiency, scoring 113.4 points per 100 possessions. They trail only the Detroit Pistons (114.0) and have a nice little lead over the third-best offense, the Dallas Mavericks (111.9). LeBron James, you could safely argue, has been the third-best offensive player in the NBA so far, with a PER of 28.7 (trailing only Elton Brand and Allen Iverson). Other Cavaliers have also been at the top of their offensive game, such as Z and Drew Gooden, whose PERs of 22.1 and 20.5, respectively, would be career highs for each if they held up.

If I had just one complaint with the offense so far, it might be with Larry Hughes, whose PER of 15.1 makes him barely league average. Hughes actually started the season well, but has really struggled of late. His True Shooting Percentage of 50.2% is the team's worst among regular contributors. I attribute this to poor shot selection. It seems to me that, when Hughes isn't driving to the basket, he's taking too many long 2-pointers, which are the worst shots you can take, as they are both low-percentage and low-reward. When Hughes does drive to the basket, he has an exceptional knack for getting to the foul line, which I applaud. I only wish he would take a step back on some of his long jumpers--it would increase his scoring potential greatly. (I was actually going to compile some data from the individual shot charts on ESPN.com to illustrate Hughes' shot selection, but then I realized just how long this would take, so for now you'll have to rely on my admittedly subjective observation. I may still do something like that in the future, though.)

But I digress. As I said, the problem does not lie with the offense, which has been the second-best in the NBA. No, the problem, if there is one, must be defensive. As a team, the Cavs have the league's 23rd-best (or 8th-worst) defensive efficiency; they allow 108.3 points per 100 possessions. Not that they don't do some things well: they lead the NBA in defensive rebounding, grabbing a remarkable 75.9% of their opponents' shots. They also rank 8th in the NBA in free throws allowed per field goal allowed, meaning they do a good job of keeping opponents off the foul line. In other words, Cavaliers opponents don't get very many shots and they don't get many free throw opportunities--yet they still manage to score quite efficiently.

The obvious explanation would be that the Cavaliers allow easy shots. Sure enough, the Cavs have allowed the league's third-highest eFG% (Effective FG%; it's like TS% but without free throws), at .513. They've also allowed the NBA's highest 3-point percentage, at .412. It seems the Cavs' biggest problem is defense on the perimeter.

Now, it's really hard to pinpoint defensive performances by individual players, especially in a system like Mike Brown's where it's supposedly all about forcing bad shots (which is truly an effort by all five players on the floor), but there are a few things we can look at. Check out this chart of the Cavaliers' Opponent Production by Position:
    eFG%   PER
PG .512 19.1
SG .525 15.5
SF .496 15.5
PF .536 18.5
C .481 13.8
Please note that the performance of opposing point guards, for example, does not correspond directly to the defensive efforts of Eric Snow and Damon Jones, and so on. Also, there are small sample size issues, as the Cavs may not yet have faced quality opposition at certain positions, etc. But it's clear from the chart that the Cavs have trouble defending point guards and power forwards. And that does not look too good for Snow, Jones, Gooden, or Donyell Marshall. Now, Gooden I'm willing to pardon to a certain extent, because he's been the team's best rebounder (he's 10th in the NBA in Rebound Rate, with 18.5) and certainly a big reason for their success in that area, and besides, he's been one of their best weapons on offense, as I've noted. Snow and Jones, however, are another story. At the very least, nothing I've seen with my admittedly subjective personal observation would contradict the suggestion that either Eric Snow or Damon Jones has trouble defending shots on the perimeter.

And it's not like either of those guys is doing anything on the offensive end that might make up for it. Jones has a PER of 13.4 and Snow has a 10.7, which ranks them 27th and 34th among NBA point guards, respectively. That's out of 39 eligible players.

Like I said, it's not yet time to panic. Even if the Cavaliers finish the season having scored 113.4 points per 100 possessions and having allowed 108.3, we would expect their record to be 50.8 wins, 31.1 losses. The Cavs have their problems right now, sure. But more than anything, they've suffered from a little bad luck. Let's all just hold our breaths a little longer.

Posted at 6:43 PM

3 Comments:

Blogger Dan Vail said…
This does raise the question of whether or not a trade for Artest would benefit the Cavs. From a strictly on the court perspective, I think Artest is a better fit for the Cavs than say, Larry Hughes. He could fit as a shooting guard with exceptional defensive talent. It might be worth entertaining the thought.

The problem is, will he ruin LeBron? Will he turn LeBron into a fan-tossing maniac? Personally, I doubt it. My biggest worry would be Artest developing some sort of feud/trouble with a teammate or coach.

Let's remember though, what bringing storied troublemaker Rasheed Wallace to Detroit did for the Pistons.
Posted at 12:44 AM, December 15, 2005  
Blogger Alex said…
Dan, since the chances of getting Ron Artest, according to Brian Windhorst, are zilch, I think we can put to rest any talk of him coming to Cleveland.

But before we do, I would not be worried about Artest influencing other players on the team. I believe it's John Hollinger who subscribes to the theory that an NBA team can safely harbor one insane player (Wallace on the Pistons comes to mind). But when two get together, look out.

I'm not sure if you'd classify any other Cavalier as insane, perhaps Damon Jones.
Posted at 12:51 AM, December 15, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said…
Indeed the Cavs have made me sick to my stomach the past few times I have watched them. Hughes gives very little effort sometimes on defense---I thought he was a all-defensive player?!? The team defense is embarrassing--even by NBA standards. It's hard to root for guys who don't even try...they just watch turds like Josh Childress, Tyronn Lue (who?), Mo Williams, and Bobby Simmons take it to the hole and have season-high nights against them. Lebron is not creating shots for other people, just scoring himself. IMO, only Drew Gooden fills his role well consistently. Hughes, Marshall, Lebron, Z, Snow, and Jones are all totally inconsistent. Each night they try to become different players based on how the game is going. This may sound pessimistic and you might not want to read it but...it seems the Cavs are getting worse as the season goes along in all aspects of basketball. If not for Lebron's ability to score, we would be slipping in every category. A lack of effort, confusion on team defense, players not understanding their roles, and a team without a clear strategy or defensive philosophy...these are sure signs of poor coaching. Philosophy, strategy and team roles should be getting better defined as the season goes along, not worse. At least when the Cavs (and Browns...and Indians) have been on losing side the past few years, they always played hard. It was mostly a case of lack of talent (comparitively). My intial point that it makes me sick is all because we are losing and it looks like they aren't even trying. I hope I'm wrong about all this.
Posted at 9:01 AM, December 15, 2005  

Post a Comment

« Home