Mistake by the Lake Sporting Times

for the Cleveland sports fan

Friday, July 8, 2005

Larry Hughes, Then

by Corey

It looks as though the Cavs will sign Larry Hughes to play shooting guard. Five years, about 65 to 70 million. I thought I'd take a little statistical look at Hughes, alongside the two players many Cavs fans had hoped for, Ray Allen and Michael Redd:
                     Hughes  Allen    Redd

age in 2006 27 30 26
new contract length 5 yrs. 5 yrs. 6 yrs.
millions per year ≈13.5 ≈16.0 ≈15.5

2005 O-Rating 110 117 110
2005 D-Rating 104 112 113
2005 player win% .691 .657 .418

career O-Rating 100 113 113
career D-Rating 105 109 109
career player win% .367 .623 .616
Note that the Cavs have reportedly signed Hughes for the exact same amount and length of time they offered to Redd. The table above would seem to reveal Hughes and Redd to be somewhat comparable, in fact, with Redd being a year younger and significantly better on offense, but Hughes being significantly better on defense. Hughes is clearly the best defender of the three. The biggest concern I have about him is that he appears to be a poor offensive contributor who happened to have a good year offensively in 2005 (10 points per 100 above his career average!). Whether or not this change represents a new level of ability or a fluctuation remains to be seen.

Ray Allen, being the oldest and most expensive, would probably have been the worst signing the Cavs could have made (out of the three). He has had the best career, clearly, but is now likely to fall off a bit.

Of course the most important part of this signing is the comparison between Hughes' numbers, above, and these:
                    Newble

2005 O-Rating 102
2005 D-Rating 109
2005 player win% .288

career O-Rating 104
career D-Rating 108
career player win% .398
I wonder if Cavs fans are a little too quick to dismiss another, in-house two-guard option: Luke Jackson. In 2006 he will be 24 years old and making about $2 mil. He didn't play enough in 2005 for us to put much stock in his statistics, making Luke something of an unknown. I hope Coach Brown at least gives Luke a chance to prove himself.

When you have cap space, as the Cavaliers do, it makes sense to use it--usually. If we assume (and I know it's a big assumption, but just for the sake of argument) that the Cavs re-sign Z and somebody else to play point guard, they will have made efficient use of their cap space for 2006; I simply hope, in the back of my mind, that the large contracts for Hughes and (perhaps) Ilgauskas do not restrict the (admittedly huge) amount of money we will need to offer LeBron two years from now.

Posted at 2:06 PM

1 Comments:

Blogger roger said…
I like the signing. I thought along the lines of Pluto on this one (defense was TERRIBLE last year so we needed the more complete player). Despite Ira Newble's "defensive specialist" label, he wasn't that good on defense. I'm hoping Luke Jackson can fill the spot-up, defense stretching guy. There are a ton of guys in the NBA who can fill that role, but for whatever reason the Cavs have been unable to get one here.
Posted at 1:38 PM, July 10, 2005  

Post a Comment

« Home