We here at Mistake by the Lake Sporting Times are nothing if not forthcoming (and thorough) in our placement of blame. Thus, while it pains me to say this, I feel I must. You see, my own dear brother and co-blogger, J. Prescott "Alex" Rubin, is personally responsible for the terrible events of yesterday. By leaving the peaceful land of Cleveland for the hostile world of Manhattan, he has somehow upset the balance of the universe, causing the Browns and Cavs to lose embarassingly to the Jets and Knicks by a combined total score of 108-95. In fact, Cleveland teams are virtually winless against New York teams since Alex took up residence there. The last time a Cleveland team beat a New York team was only a couple of days after Alex arrived in New York, well before his classes had even started. And even that victory was by a slim margin, as the Indians barely managed to squeak by the Yankees, 22-0. Since that day, Cleveland teams are 0-5 against their New York counterparts. This can't be a coincidence.
Compare that, now, with the unbelievable success our beloved Cleveland teams have had against those of Chicago since the day that
I took up residence in the Windy City. Over the past 39 months, the Cavs, Browns and Indians are a combined 70-0 against the Bulls, Bears, and White Sox. Incredible! Anyway, I know that Alex is sorry for what he's done, and we're working to see if we can correct the problem, but it may be too late.
In the meantime, however, we are left to pour over the remains of a Browns game that was pretty ugly. If Phil Dawson had simply chosen to show up yesterday, instead of sending a robot Dawson look-alike to take his place, we would almost certainly have won the game. If the robot Dawson, though, had managed to make just
one of his field goal attempts, we would at least have sent the game to overtime.
The defense, of course, played extremely well, against an offense that has been among the
best in football (this despite the popular belief that the Jets have overachieved). The defense has Quincy Carter to thank for a good portion of their success, though, as the Jets' QB failed to take advantage of the one area in which he might possibly be confused for a successful NFL player: his mobility.
The Browns' offense, on the other hand, gave another characteristic crappy performance. Despite committing no turnovers and allowing only one sack, they managed only 7 points. Part of the problem was the insane number of times Jeff Garcia had to throw the ball away just to barely avoid a sack. At this point, it's obvious to everyone on the planet Earth that the problem is the offensive line. The Browns have adequate (or better) talent at all of the other positions on offense. But now, with Ryan Tucker succumbing to injury, we are faced with the possibilty of a starting O-line of Verba, Sleepy, Sneezy, Dopey and Doc. I submit that we may be better off forgetting about fielding a left tackle, and simply conceding that side of the field to the opposing defense.
Play of the Week
Alex says: It was Sheiden, #82½, dragging Jets' safety Eric Coleman nearly 10 yards after a short reception until being pushed out of bounds. The refs spotted it as a 2nd-and-1, but we all know it was really a first down. This was one of the few memorable plays of the game, and one of the even fewer memorable
good plays for the Browns.
Corey says: I agree that it was Eric Coleman's piggy-back ride on Steve Heiden. I, however, prefer to give Mr. Heiden full credit for his performance, instead of concocting some silly nickname that attempts to pretend Heiden and Shea are the same person. Don't get me wrong -- I'm all for silly nicknames -- but the whole "Sheiden" thing is just not for me. Earl Little's interception (complete with cocky, twinkle-toes runback) is a distant runner-up.
Player of the Week
Alex says: Andra Davis. The Browns defense played very well for the game overall, and it's sad that a few missed tackles on Lamont Jordan at the end were the last nail in the coffin. Personally, I don't like pinning down the outcome of a game on a few plays--for the defense finally bothered a quarterback consistently during the game. That was especially unexpected given the Jets offensive line was 3rd in the League in
sack rank coming into the game. Andra is undoubtedly the best player on the defense, and while he didn't pressure Quincy Carter as much as Chaun (?!), that's because Andra wasn't blitzed as often by Campo. In addition, Andra seemed to be involved in nearly every tackle during the game.
However, not everything went perfectly on the defense. With QB/running joke Quincy Carter starting, why didn't the secondary press the receivers? We saw during the game Carter badly overthrow or just merely miss his receivers on long routes. Despite the speed of WRs like Santana Moss, Carter wouldn't've been able to get the ball to them anyway if the CBs pressed. Instead, this week, Anthony Henry repeated his sleepy performance of last week and Daylon did his best Anthony Henry impression.
Corey says: I didn't see anything wrong with the secondary yesterday. Quincy carter only passed for, like, 100 yards. If the defense had one weakness, it was the fact that they gave up significant runs to both Curtis Martin and Lamont Jordan. Since a majority of these runs were straight up the middle, I can't give my Player of the Week to Andra. I'll give it to Chaun Thompson, for lack of anyone better. He had the most sacks, but really, the whole defense deserves praise. They really punchasized Quincy Carter's face, for free.
Postgame Quote of the Week
Alex says:
The one thing that I do have a great deal of respect about these players is that after last week’s loss, almost--not unanimously but almost unanimously--the majority of the players came in on Monday and Tuesday. And it was like, “Coach what can we do?" Talking to the position coaches and coordinators and myself, "what can we do to try to win a game? How do we approach this?"
--Butch Davis. So given that the Browns players played as hard as possible and practiced as much and efficiently as possible, why did the Browns lose? Given Davis' words, it would be difficult to place the blame on the team because they played so hard and practiced diligently in preparation of the game. I think that the answer is a combination of two factors, both of which eventually fall at Davis' feet: (a) The players may be playing hard, but they are not receiving the right plays to execute to have a halfway decent offense and/or (b) the Browns don't have talented enough players to compete with good teams. No matter how well prepared you are, if your team has no talent, you'll lose.
Corey says:
It was one of my best games, but it wasn't good enough. I could have a million sacks and a million tackles, [but] if we don't win that game, it don't mean nothing.
--Chaun Thompson. Just for fun, I'm trying to think of a way that Chaun could have a million sacks. I don't think it's possible, but if it were, there would be no way the Browns could lose the game, as Chaun suggests. For starters, Chaun would have to record a sack on every play of the game. If each sack, for example, forced a fumble that was recovered by the Browns and returned for a touchdown, then the Browns' offense would never take the field, and Chaun would have lots and lots of opportunities for sacks. The constant scoring, then, would keep the clock stopped after each play, once again allowing Chaun more opportunities. If we are overly optimistic, and assume that each repetition of this pattern took about 10 seconds off the clock, then the most sacks I could see Chaun recording would be about 360. While this would certainly be impressive and would guarantee a Browns victory, it's far from being a million sacks.
Ryan Pontbriand Honorary Special Teams Moment of the Week
Alex says: Richard Alston once again running back a long kickoff return. While he usually offsets one great return with a couple of pedestrian or even boneheaded plays, Alston yesterday was consistently above average. But I don't want to highlight just Alston for making nice runs, but the man who is most responsible for the runs, Frisman Jackson. On each of the three long returns Jackson threw a key block. His presence was fundamental in Alston breaking out and getting big yards.
Corey says: How about Orpheus Roye getting his fingertips on the Jets' first FG attempt? I may be mistaken, but I think this was the first blocked kick the Browns have had this season. And who would have ever expected to see Orpheus win the RPHSTMOTW?
Obscure Brown of the Week
Alex says: Michael Lehan. While most of us probably remember him missing a leg tackle on Justin McCareins on the Jets' touchdown, but he did a very good job replacing Daylon as a starting corner. I don't know if I can blame the corners themselves for giving big cushions to receivers any more because that seems like a team-wide philosophy, but I think Lehan is a very good backup. Hopefully he'll let his 'dreads continue to grow and will soon surpass
Mike McKenzie.
Corey says: Adimchinobe Echemandu, the newest obscure Brown. It was his 24th birthday yesterday, and also his first NFL game. So even though he didn't get in on any action, he deserves some recognition. Here's hoping he sticks around long enough to warrant the purchase of an "Echemandu" jersey.
Fashion of the Week
Alex says: While the orange jerseys are an affront to all that is holy, I guess I have to choose from slim pickins, so I say the #83 "SHEA". If I were a Brown and were lucky enough to score a touchdown at home, I'm not sure whether I'd leap into the crowd as Shea customarily does. I've noticed that each time he does so he gets lots of beer spilled in his face. While that isn't terribly important, still, I don't think I want some stranger spilling liquids in my face. I think I'd instead go with an awesomely creative endzone dance.
Corey says: I'd like to take this opportunity to complain about the orange jerseys as well. I have absolutely no idea why these hideous jerseys are so beloved by the fans. They would look fine on plenty of other teams, but they are so distinctly un-Browns-like. If the team feels the need to continue selling them to the fans because they bring in so much money, so be it, but do they have to continue wearing them in real-live games? Anyway, my Fashion of the Week is a good old
brown #5 "GARCIA". Stop the madness, people: if you're going to be like everyone else and buy the jersey of the starting quarterback, at least go with the color that looks good.
Cheater of the Week
Alex says: Phil Simms, for constantly suggesting that the Browns have to get back to their gameplan from Week 1 against the Ravens. He repeatedly hinted at the Browns offensive success, especially in the running game, that week. Oh is that so, Phil? Well, as a
matter of fact, the Ravens outgained the Browns that week, both in the air and on the ground. They had more first downs too. The Browns won though due to a couple of lucky/big plays (Quincy's TD and the two turnovers). How I miss being able to turn off idiotic TV commentators and listen to Jim, Doug, and Casey every Sunday. Damn CBS.
Corey says: I really don't have anything against any members of the Jets, so I guess I'll go with Jim Nantz, just to complete the CBS sweep of this category. For some reason, it really bothered me the way Nantz kept saying "Equiban". Jim, it's "Ekuban"! Football announcers, in general, are attrociously horrible; it doesn't matter who's covering the Browns in a given week, they're guaranteed to do a terrible job.
Next week: The Browns piss away any chance they had at the #1 draft pick, as their slow climb out of the basement begins with a stunning victory over the Cincinnati Bengals. Join us here, for another inspiring edition of "Born and Raised"!